Gestion et mesure des grands projets : une nouvelle approche
Level 1 is a project having a standard product
and a stable proven design. Operation would be highly routine and
systematized with standard processes and operate within the bounds of
relatively fixed rules. Here is process management that establishes an
implementation model applicable to initiatives where product design and
functionality is mature and readily understood. The standard rules and
regulations are the correct reference for conduct of the work and the
nature of the challenge is one of logistically bringing the factors of
production together to maximize productivity. Level 1 rule-based
solutions feature maximum predictability and outcomes generally surpass
initial project expectations.
Level 2 is a project having a tangible product,
an evolving design, stable technology and low integration. Project
results are foreseen to operate within broader bounds of relatively
fixed methods. At level 2, project management establishes an
implementation model applicable to initiatives that are custom in
nature. Here the standard rules and regulations don’t sufficiently
address the circumstances of the initiative and the standard and
routine practice must be dynamically altered accordingly. This is the
level appropriate for the classical project management response
addressed earlier. The nature of the challenge at level 2 is in
planning and implementing careful organization of people and materials
to ensure the planned outcome. Level 2 methods-based solutions feature
reasonably high predictability and outcomes generally approximate the
initial project expectations.
Level 3 is a project with evolving requirements and a containable total system
responsibility. It entails closed system engineering with significant
internal integration risk. It generally features a semi-tangible
product and leading edge technology. At level 3, project management
establishes an implementation model applicable to initiatives that are
not only custom in nature, but also feature speculative applications of
technology, materials and developmental functionalities. Through the
ensuing investigative developments, the originally planned methods of
project implementation must be dynamically altered to maintain the
overarching mission objective. The nature of the challenge at level 3
is in setting the project strategy that will guide the evolution of the
work to the required mission. The solution approach is cyclical in
nature and usually features the trial and error application of
developmental technologies. Level 3 objectives-based solutions feature
high unpredictability, a relatively high rate of project failure to
meet initial expectations.
Level 4 is an evolution project.
The end product deeply affects many people, changing, in a fundamental
way the manner in which they conduct business and with that, their
ability to achieve their objectives. These projects must simultaneously
consider project issues and severe implications to routine business. At
level 4, portfolio governance establishes a model for situating a new
business approach within an open network of stakeholders. The external
environment has more control on the situation than the internal project
team and, for this reason, governance as opposed to management becomes
the key approach. Through the interplay between the project
practitioners and the environment stakeholders, objectives dynamically
evolve under the overarching common reference of corporate principles.
The nature of the challenges at level 4 is in seeking the right balance
between project functionality and stakeholder common interest, while
facilitating a cultural shift within the environment that will enable
the new mode of operation. Level 4 principle-based solutions have
consistently had no chance of achieving initial project expectations.
The basis for proceeding is to revitalize the project organization
within the surrounding business environment. Initial project targets of
cost, time and functionality are not the basis for measuring
performance and determining success.